Sign-In:  
New Member: Harshavardhan Devadiga, India | Join Now! |
Sep, 02
 
Why Do Saudis Kill Innocents?

Damman, April 20

Pray for me. I will be killed after a few hours."

Her husband's last words still rings in 28-year-old Ramla's ears.

It was the morning of February 22, 2005, when the phone rang. Ramla was hoping to hear some good news when she heard her husband's voice at last. Naickam Ittiparambil Shahjahan had languished in prison in Damman, Saudi Arabia, for five years, awaiting a reprieve from the Saudi authorities, sparing his life.

But that was not to be. Shahjahan was beheaded a few hours after he called his wife to say goodbye forever.

"I do not know why they killed him. Why has Allah done this to us?" laments Ramla.

Shahjahan's execution has plunged his family, which grapples with poverty every day, into grief and helplessness.

Five days after his execution, the ministry of external affairs in New Delhi received a message from the Saudi Arabian government, which officially admitted that Shahjahan was 'innocent.'

"This is the first such official revelation of executing an innocent foreign national in any country in the world," says human rights activist Mukundan C Menon.

Shahjahan is one of dozens of Indians who are beheaded in Saudi Arabia, where some 1.3 million Indians work.

No official numbers of executions are available from the Saudi government. But according to human rights groups, the kingdom has executed at least 17 people this year. At least 35 people were executed last year; 53 people were beheaded in 2003. Among them some 18 Indians.

"The increasing number of executions are the biggest risk Indians face there," points out Menon, secretary general, Confederation of Human Rights Organisations.

Last year Menon helped New York-based Human Rights Watch prepare a report on the abuse of foreign workers in Saudi Arabia.

Titled Bad Dreams

Exploitation and Abuse of Migrant Workers in Saudi Arabia, the report said foreign workers, who comprise one-third of the kingdom's population, face torture, forced confessions and unfair trials when they are accused of crimes.

'The victims include skilled and unskilled workers; Muslims, Hindus, and Christians; young adults travelling outside their home countries for the first time; and married men, and single and divorced women, with children to support,' Human Rights Watch said.

The report revealed the abysmal and exploitative labour conditions many workers face, and the utter failure of the Saudi judicial system to provide redress.

Saudi Arabia, which implements strict Islamic Sharia law, executes convicted murderers, rapists and drug traffickers, usually by public beheading.

What was Shahjahan's crime?

The Saudi Arabia government says Shahjahan smuggled brown sugar in his shoes when he boarded the flight from Chennai to Damman.

"What is brown sugar?" asks Shahjahan's father Pakkar Mohammed who runs a tea shop in a rented building in Moolavayal village in Kerala's northern Wayanad district. He borrowed Rs 30,000 from friends and relatives to send his son to Saudi Arabia.

"I was thrilled when my son got a visa. But we heard nothing from him after he went to Saudi Arabia. We have not seen his dead body. Why do they kill innocents like this?" moans Mohammed.

Shahjahan was recruited as a manual labourer by a local travel agent, who arranged the monthly Rs 12,000 job through a recruitment agency in Chennai.

When he boarded his first flight from Chennai to Damman in March 1999, Shahjahan had only one hope -- earn some money to help his poor 10-member family. In Chennai, the travel agents bought him a set of trousers and shoes. Shahjahan had never worn shoes before in his life. And so, Shahjahan flew to realise his dream in the shoes the agents gifted him.

As soon as he arrived in Damman, the Saudi police arrested Shahjahan because they found 550 grams of brown sugar from his shoes.

His young wife Ramla was looking forward to a letter from Shahjahan. Instead, she received a phone call from a neighbour working in Saudi Arabia, who told her Shahjahan was in jail and had been sentenced to death.

Terrified, the family petitioned the Kerala government's Non-Resident Affairs Department, which took up Shahjahan's case with the Indian embassy in Saudi Arabia. But the family's appeals and the Indian embassy's request to spare Shahjahan from death did not help.

Activist Mukundan C Menon who worked hard to save Shahjahan's life says an undetermined number of foreigners, among them Indians, have been sentenced to death in the kingdom and await execution. Details of their trials and the evidence presented to convict them are treated as a State secret.

"The tragedy is that in many cases, the condemned men did not know they had been sentenced to death, and their embassies were only informed after the fact," says Menon.

Last year, an Indian diplomat in the Gulf said no advance information is given to the embassy before Indians are beheaded. "We get the information after the execution from local newspapers," he said.

After the execution, the body is not returned to the family. Relatives receive no official information about the location of the mortal remains in Saudi Arabia.

Abdul Nassar, general secretary, Pravasi Malayalee Council, an organisation of Gulf-returnees based in Kerala, says smuggling of drugs from India has witnessed an alarming increase after Pakistan and Argentina tightened measures against drug trafficking.

"Innocent job-seekers are used by the drug mafia as couriers without their knowledge. They are caught and killed in Saudi Arabia," says Nassar, who worked in that country for several years. "The Government of India needs to do something to end this menace and the killing spree in Saudi Arabia."

Is the Indian government taking up the executions of Indians with the Saudi government?

It is. But the response from the Saudi government has been defiant. In 2002, then Indian President K R Narayanan petitioned the Saudi authorities to spare an Indian from execution. Narayanan wrote that the Indian was innocent and should be freed.

Narayanan got no reply. Instead, the Indian was executed the very next week.

Courtesy: Rediff

 Comment on this article Print this articlePrint article |  Send this article to a friend E-mail article
Name: Country:
Comments:
Security code: Security code   Reload Image
Enter code:   (shown above)
ozie, India May 11, 2005
It is common knowledge for asians employed in the gulf countries that there is very little scope for fair justice. The countries have monarchy and there is rarely a fair trial. There is no chance of a defence lawyer like in India. If the dispute is with a local arab you had it. The local arab can fight it out as it is his country and the people and language are known to him. The asians have to look dumb and plead for mercy even when they are innocent. I believe in European countries it is much better as there is certain amount of equality and justice and Immigrants can even become their citizens after few years of stay whereas in the gulf you will remain a foreigner even if you are there for a lifetime and you can be kicked off anytime without notice.
Zeena j Noronha, Oman Apr 21, 2005
Mark,

Report says President himself wrote letter to SA govt officials and got no reply! Does it means there is no any way to safegurad this innocent ppl's life from Indian govt side?
It's very sorry to note such happenings!
 
Web Mangalorean.Com
 
Privacy  |  Terms and Conditions  |  Tell your Friend  |  Contact Us  |  Join Us  |  Home    
Site designed and maintained by Mangalorean Media LLC.