FIFTH AUGUST 2020: A LAMENTABLE DAY INDEED!
Fifth August 2020: Sometime after noon, a ‘bhoomi pujan’ will take place in Ayodhya; this will mark the beginning of the construction work for a Ram temple, at the site where the Babri Masjid once stood. The construction of the temple is expected to take three years and the costs, yet undisclosed, will surely run into astronomical amounts. The Babri Masjid- Ram Mandir fight, has been one of the most contentious issues in post-independent India. It has resulted in plenty of bloodshed, destruction, violence, hate and divisiveness. In November 2019 in a rather unpalatable, controversial, yet historic written judgement (which is still unsigned), the Supreme Court granted the entire 2.77 acres of disputed land in Ayodhya to the Hindu litigants. In that very judgment, for apparently ‘balancing equities’, the court directed the Central and Uttar Pradesh governments to allot an alternative five acres of land to the Muslim party to build a mosque. Many thinking citizens of India (mainly from the majority community) are not unhappy with the judgement but also the fact that the ‘bhoomi pujan’ is taking place- which will add to the polarization of an already divided nation! A lamentable day indeed!
Fifth August 2020: The Prime Minister will be present for the ‘bhoomi pujan.’ He will not going there as a private citizen but as a Constitutional authority who is expected to protect and promote the secular fabric of the country. Despite pleas from several sections of society that he does not participate in the event, he has thrown all caution and propriety to the wind, in order to display his threw colours (he stopped hiding them a long time ago) The majority of Indians are Hindu; but thanks to the vision and ideals of our Constituent Assembly secularism was allowed to flourish with (at least theoretically) all religions treated with respect and allowed to grow. In the path breaking judgment of 1994 of S.R. Bommai vs Union of India, secularism was recognised as part of the basic structure of the constitution; Justice Jeevan Reddy held that the constitution does not recognise or permit mixing religion and state power, and the two must be kept apart.
The judgement states, “if the Constitution requires the State to be secular in thought and action, the same requirement attaches to political parties as well. The Constitution does not recognise, it does not permit, mixing religion and State power. Both must be kept apart. That is the constitutional injunction. None can say otherwise so long as this Constitution governs this country. Introducing religion into politics is to introduce an impermissible element into body politic and an imbalance in our constitutional system. If a political party espousing a particular religion comes to power, that religion tends to become, in practice, the official religion. All other religions come to acquire a secondary status, at any rate, a less favourable position. This would be plainly antithetical to Articles 14 to 16, 25 and the entire constitutional scheme adumbrated herein above. Under our Constitution, no party or Organisation can simultaneously be a political and a religious party. “With the PM actually being there at the ‘bhoomi pujan’ makes it a lamentable day indeed!
Fifth August 2020: Rashid, the firebrand young activist from Kashmiri, an alumnus of JNU has been one of those voices who has, despite all odds, been trying to keep Kashmir on the nation’s agenda. It is an uphill task indeed. In an interview to HuffPost India (4 August 2020) when asked “How do you feel one year after Article 370 was revoked?” Rashid said, “I straddle two very complex identities of Indian Muslim and a Kashmiri woman. In this new India, the space for me as a woman, as a Muslim, as a Kashmiri, and as a research student, is shrinking. The space to be different is shrinking. There is an attempt to paint everything in one colour and homogenize a very diverse country.
One used to be afraid of being a Kashmiri in Delhi, now one is afraid of being a Kashmiri in Kashmir. It could be just psychological but that is what the government is doing. The biggest change is a feeling of insecurity. We have this feeling that Kashmir, our home, a distinct place where our culture could thrive, seems to be slipping away. That it is being snatched away from us. There is already a sense of nostalgia”. There are other voices from civil society too, who no uncertain terms condemn the assault on the rights and freedom of the people of #KashmirCaged #StandWithKashmir #ReleasePoliticalPrisoners #Restore4G #EndOccupation .Making the reality there today: a lamentable day indeed!
There is a small book in the Holy Bible called the ‘Book of Lamentations’, the writer says, “Moreover, our eyes failed, looking in vain for help; from our towers we watched for a nation that could not save us. People stalked us at every step, so we could not walk in our streets. Our end was near, our days were numbered, for our end had come. (4: 17-18) and further, “You, LORD, reign forever; your throne endures from generation to generation. Why do you always forget us? Why do you forsake us so long? Restore us to yourself, LORD, that we may return; renew our days as of old” (5:19-21). Words worth reflecting on, this Fifth August 2020: a lamentable day indeed!
The Author: Fr Cedric Prakash SJ is a human rights and peace activist/writer.