Hyderabad (PTI): Former Solicitor General of India N. Santosh Hegde said on Monday that he was in “favour” of the sedition law as some “restrictions” were needed to stop people from abusing and talking against the country.
The retired Supreme Court judge argued that the act of some Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) students, who allegedly termed the execution of Parliament attack convict Afzal Guru “judicial murder” and raised anti-India slogans, “definitely amounts” to sedition.
Missing students surface
JNU Students Union president Kanhaiya Kumar was arrested on sedition charges earlier this month. Five students, accused of sedition and missing for days, surfaced on the JNU campus last night.
“I believe in sedition law. I am a patriot. Any patriot cannot go on abusing the country. There are certain parameters,” the former Karnataka Lokayukta told PTI.
Allegiance with some other country
“Many people think differently in this country whose allegiance is with some other country or some other group … if democracy has to survive, then there should be some restrictions on the people talking against the country.
“Forget all other things. You criticise the government, criticise the individuals, criticise the system. Patriotism can never be criticised,” he said.
Sorry, I don’t agree with SC
Mr. Hegde has said he does not believe in the previous judgement of the Supreme Court that says mere talk is not sedition and should be followed by actions, something contrary to law.
“I don’t believe in that judgement. Sedition means propagating some views which are against the nation. As long as the judgement of the Supreme Court is there, I am bound to say it is the law of the day today. I am one of those persons who would say that the judgement should be changed,” Mr. Hegde said, citing events in the JNU after the February 9 controversial event, including violence in Patiala House.
Patriotism sacrosanct
“You can’t meddle with patriotism. Everything is alright [but] patriotism can never be compromised,” Mr. Hegde said.
He strongly sought to counter those who favour junking the century-old sedition law saying it was an archaic legislation and a relic of British colonialism.
“What about Indian Penal Code. How old is it? You scrap Indian Penal Code because somebody is involved in a crime? [and wants it to be scrapped]. It is a 230-year-old act. You change it,” Mr. Hegde said, reacting angrily to suggestions in some quarters on scrapping the sedition law.
Thanks Mr Hegde. I agree with your view. Irrespective of politics behind these incidents, fact remains that this is a case of of sedition. You have cleared my doubt about sedition is applicable or not with these antinational elements.
With all due respect to Mr Hegde it must be pointed out that like him others too have the right to differ with other judgments of the SC. Patriotism is not something to be worn on one’s sleeve. It must be expressed thru one’s actions – respecting the Constitution and our multi-cultural legacy and positive contribution to social harmony and national progress thru all round human development.
I disagree with Mr.Hegde in principle. I agree that even anti-national chants are protected under free speech. I fully support free speech even though I may not agree with what is being said.
However, here is the real sad thing – The same principles of free speech are not applied to one specific group. If you want proof, ask any random ‘journalist’ on his/her opinions on ‘cartoon’ controversy and see how fast he runs and hides under table!!! LOL LOL