Los Angeles, Jan 19 (IANS) Reality TV star Kourtney Kardashian posed completely naked for a photoshoot in the latest episode of “Keeping Up With The Kardashians”.
“I got asked to pose for this nude shoot which is going to be in a fine art gallery. I work out every single day so I feel like, why not?” the 36-year-old said, reports mirror.co.uk.
Photographer Brian Bowen Smith admitted he wanted Kourtney’s famous sisters to be green with envy when they saw the results of the shoot.
“If you’re not blown away by your picture, then it means we didn’t do it right,” he said.
“You’ll be pleasantly surprised how nice your a** is going to look. We want to make your sisters jealous.”
Kylie Jenner, 18, was present for the photo session and was astounded by how great Kourtney was looking.
Claiming the eldest of the TV clan was her “favourite sister” because of her new-found strength, she told the camera: “She is focusing on herself and laughing again and just being the Kourtney I knew like five years ago.”
The photographs – which are printed on metallic paper and presented with no glass to emphasise the “tantalising textures of skin” – went on display at the De Re Gallery here between October 22 and November 19.
Cheryl may not change surname following divorce
Singer Cheryl Fernandez-Versini, who is in the process of divorcing husband Jean-Bernard Fernandez-Versini, has reportedly filed official documents using the name since the split.
“The X Factor” judge previously used Tweedy and Cole before marrying Jean-Bernard in July 2014.
Filed by her firm CC Couture Ltd, the documents request that all paperwork remain in her current name, according to The Sun newspaper, reports mirror.co.uk.
It’s believed that Cheryl faces a dilemma with the name as she considers reinventing herself for the third time.
A source told the newspaper: “Cheryl has had to reinvent herself several times but her three past names all have very different memories.
“Tweedy is associated with her assault court case, Cole with Ashley’s cheating and now her new name with another failed marriage.”
The source adds that the new documents – listed as Change of Particulars for Director – may not be representative of whether she’s considering changing her name.
Instead the forms are said to have only appeared due to a ‘clerical error’ and were actually filed last year.
“The paperwork must have been held up as she registered this company when she was with Ashley and changed the name some time ago,” the source said.
“The name change went through with Companies House in early 2015.”
Cheryl’s representatives have refused to comment on the situation.